Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

back to ideas

Pink brains? Or, neurosexism?

Increasingly neuroscience is invoked to tell us the nature of human beings and their cognitive capacities. Schools rely heavily on that science, and it informs our understandings of the education of girls.

We rethink that here. This article examines the representations of girls and gender that operate within the popular ideas of “pink brains” and “blue brains.” As brain research moves into education and teacher training, what are the implications for curriculum, pedagogy, and school organization? We discern that findings from neuroscience confirm familiar images of girls: as early maturing, emotional, needing to feel liked by teachers, and as needing abstract ideas connected to real life. Writers utilizing the evidence of brain research are quick to call brains “hard-wired” and equally quick to call for sex-segregated classrooms. In interpreting neuroscience in critical ways, the social contexts and political implications of imaging young women as hard-wired brains are highlighted.

Read paper here +

Photo by Gaspar Uhas on Unsplash

Related resources

Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps by Lise Eliot (Mariner Books, 2010)

Brainstorm: The Flaw in the Science of Sex Difference by Rebecca M. Jordan-Young (Harvard University Press, 2011)